Al-hamdulillah 'ala umur ad-Din wa ad-Dawlah, was-solatu was-salaamu 'ala Rasulillah al-mustafaa, wa 'ala 'aalihi wa sahbihi wa man tabi'ahum wa waalaah..
Umat Islam yang tercinta. Ungkapan ini adalah kewajipan di atas kewajipan bagi semua pejuang Islam di bumi bertuah Malaysia ini dan seluruh alam Islam bahkan di seluruh pelusuk dunia ini amnya. Mengapakah Tarbiyah Islamiah, Ruhiyah, Tanzimiah, Da'awiyah, Harakiyyah dan Tarbiyah Dawlah Islamiyah PENTING?.
Jawapannya gerakan GLOBALISASI BARAT akan hanya berjaya dihadapi dan dikuasai oleh mereka yang beriltizam penuh dengan PEMBENTUKAN INSAN RABBANIY melalui ACUAN PEMBENTUKAN GENERASI RASULULLAH SAW yang unik, walau di zaman mana sekalipun pun mereka berada, Paksi Kemenangan akan beralih kepada GENERASI YANG MEREALISASIKAN TARBIYAH ISLAMIAH SYAMILAH ( Pembentukan Generasi Islam sejati secara menyeluruh). Semuannya dibuat dan menjadi WAJIB kerana ingin mengundang BANTUAN DAN PERTOLONGAN ALLAH SWT TANPA SYAK DAN RAGU di dalam apa jua bentuk perjuangan. Kalah atau menang di dunia ini, perkiraan Allah swt ialah FI SABEELILLAH - BERADA DI JALAN ALLAH SWT. Inilah golongan yang TIDAK MENGENAL ERTI KEKALAHAN,malah Allah swt menjanjikan KEMENANGAN KEPADA MEREKA, SAMADA MEREKA MENANG DI DUNIA ATAU SYAHID...KEDUA-DUANYA ADALAH KEMENANGAN UMAT ISLAM.
Maka untuk itu ARUS GLOBALISASI BARAT harus dihadapi dengan UNIVERSALISASI ISLAM. Ubahlah perjuangan KEBANGSAAN YANG MENJANJIKAN NEGARA BANGSA ( Tajaan Penjajah) kepada NEGARA ISLAM (Tajaan Allah swt yang MAHA ADIL) YANG AKAN MEMAYUNGI DAN MEMBERI HAK SEMUA BANGSA MANUSIA DI DALAM SATU ACUAN KEADILAN ISLAM DARI ALLAH SWT.
Sekian buat renungan dari:
ABU 'AMRULLAH MUHAMMAD ADIS EL-MERBAWIY AD-DUNJANAAWIY
________________________________________________________________
Friday, November 7, 2008
PAS mula perkasa tarbiyyah
JERANTUT: PAS memulakan program untuk memperkasakan kembali program terbiyyah kepada ahli-ahlinya - satu usaha yang dilihat untuk mengurangkan banyak masalah yang melanda parti itu.
Lebih satu dekad lalu program terbiyyah PAS dikatakan semakin kurang diberi perhatian oleh pengikut parti itu, satu tempoh yang menyaksikan keahlian PAS bertambah berkali ganda dengan penyertaan daripada pelbagai golongan masyarakat.
Justeru memperkasakan kembali tarbiyyah dikalangan pengikut-pengikut PAS diyakini faktor penting sebagai persediaan dalaman untuk menghadapi cabaran semasa dan kelangsungan daya tahan parti.
"PAS yang ditubuhkan pada tahun 1951 bertahan sehingga ke hari ini kerana apa? Tarbiyyah..." kata Timbalan Presiden parti itu, Nasharuddin Mat Isa dalam Konvensyen Tarbiyyah peringkat negeri Pahang.
"Tapi hari ini saya percaya ada kawasan yang sudah tidak menjalankan usrah (salah satu dari pengisian tarbiyyah) lagi," tambah beliau.
Selain usrah iaitu satu bentuk perbincangan berkumpulan dikalangan ahli PAS biasanya dibuat secara bulanan, pengisian lain yang popular dalam program tarbiyyah PAS ialah tamrin dan mukhayyam.
Nasharuddin merupakan pengerusi Lujnah Tarbiyyah PAS, satu jawatan yang sebelum ini dipegang oleh Presiden, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang - kini memulakan usaha memperkasakan kembali elemen yang dikatakan kunci kekuatan PAS itu.
Setakat ini dilaporkan tiga negari telah selesai mengadakan pusingan pertama Konvensyen Tarbiyyah, program ini akan dilaksanakan keseluruh negara di mana menglibatkan Presiden dan Timbalan Presiden sendiri sebagai pembentang kertas kerja.
Dua timbalan kepada Nasharuddin telah dilantik iaitu Idris Ahmad dan Abu Bakar Chik yang akan melaksanakan peranan masing-masing bagi memastikan nafas baru kepada program tarbiyyah.
Posted by Siasah at 1:29 AM 103 comments
Reference:
http://siasahdaily.blogspot.com/
Monday, November 17, 2008
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Theology versus Secularism
Theology Versus Secularism
Posted by Super Admin
Friday, 31 October 2008 11:09
NO HOLDS BARRED
by:
Raja Petra Kamarudin
It appears like the Turkish Prime Minister is in trouble with Turkey’s court. They have accused him of being anti-secular, which is a crime in Turkey. They say the Prime Minister want to abolish or remove the anti-tudung law, which means Turkey’s citizens will no longer be forced NOT to wear the tudung. If you remember, recently, a Turkish lady Member of Parliament was evicted from parliament for insisting that she wear her tudung in the building. University student too must remove their tudung before they enter the university gate.
Turkey is on the other extreme of Afghanistan where the “religious police” would throw acid on faces of women who do not wear the tudung.
Malaysia of 2008 is a far cry from Malaysia of 1958, the first Anniversary of Merdeka. Then, skirts and bare-backs were the order of the day and the tudung was a rare thing at best, the more “decent” Malay women would wear a selendang wit the front hair revealed. Today, women who wear bare-back clothes are arrested.
What happened over those 50 years? Have Malays become more religious and more conscious of their Islamic duties? Over the last month, three women have been charged for corruption and fraud. All are pretty senior Malay government officers. And all wear the tudung. So, the wearing of the tudung can’t be equated with being more religious or being a better Muslim. If not, they would not accept bribes or cheat. Wearing the tudung is merely a symbol. It is a symbol that you are very Islamic. But this does not mean you really are.
Malays, today, talk about restoring the Caliphate and implementing Islamic laws. In short, rejecting a Secular State in favour of a Theology State – meaning an Islamic State of course. But do these some people know what an Islamic State is? And do these people also know how the many experiments of Islamic States have gone horribly wrong and the new “Islamic” government was worse than the old government it replaced?
In a nutshell a Secular State or Theology State is just a name. Names are not crucial. What is would be the function rather than form. Form must follow functions, and not the other way round.
Let us examine some of the failed experiments. Some predominantly Muslim countries have flirted with the idea of changing their government and have discovered that the newly installed Muslim leaders were no better, or worse, that the “kafir” leaders. Millions have died because of this, Muslims killed at the hand of Muslims.
Kurdistan, Afghanistan, Armenia, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Morocco, Sudan, Pakistan, Serbia, Gratis, Syria, Bosnia – just think of any country where either Muslims, Christians or Jews make up the majority population and I will show you a tragedy. No, theology is not the answer. We can’t solve problems by replacing a Secular State with a Theology State. History has shown us that, in fact, more damage is caused. The system is not the solution. It is those behind the system that matter.
A year after the end of the Second World War the Algerians wanted the French Colonialists out of their country. The eight-year war led to the loss of more than a million lives. Both sides wee equally guilty of the barbaric killings where old folks, babies and women were not spared. Finally, in 1962, the French decided to go home. But until today the killings continue; except now it is not Muslims killing Christians but Islamists killing Secularists – and vice versa.
The Turks too wanted the kafir out, so millions of Armenians were massacred. The Kurds were the willing servants to rape and murder the Armenians. This was ethic cleansing of the kind perpetuated by the Germans during World War 2; though maybe only a quarter in number died compared to the Jews.
Later the Kurds were themselves exterminated by the Iraqis and Turks. And the same went for the Afghans where they first killed each other to establish an Islamic State and then the Islamic State killed off as many as the previous “kafir” state did. In Iran, too, more died in the new Islamic State than in the Shah’s “kafir” state.
An Islamic State is no guarantee that you would get a good government. Neither would a Secular State. So it is best that the rhetoric and setting up an Islamic State be discarded and instead we focus on the issue of the setting up of a just state of whatever kind.
We have seen too many deaths over the last 60 years, people killed in the name of Islam. Tens of millions have been killed. Two million in Afghanistan. One million in Iran. One million in Iraq. One million in Turkey. More than one million in Algeria. Many more millions in other Muslim countries. The list goes on.
The Iranians say: those Iranians who died fighting Iraqis are going to heaven as the Iraqis are “kafir”. The Iraqis say: those Iraqis who died fighting Iranians are going to heaven as the Iranians are “kafir”. So, both Iranians and Iraqis are “kafir”. Or is it both Iranians and Iraqis who kill each other are going to heaven since both kill and die in the name of Islam?
With all this killing and the tens of millions of deaths over the last 60 years, all the so-called “Islamic States” are nothing short of failed states whereas “God-less” states like Sweden are heaven on earth.
Maybe you need to choose an Islamic State to go to heaven. But thus far all the Islamic States have proven to be hell. Maybe this is because they talk more about life after death rather than about life itself.
Reference:
http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/14435/84/
Posted by Super Admin
Friday, 31 October 2008 11:09
NO HOLDS BARRED
by:
Raja Petra Kamarudin
It appears like the Turkish Prime Minister is in trouble with Turkey’s court. They have accused him of being anti-secular, which is a crime in Turkey. They say the Prime Minister want to abolish or remove the anti-tudung law, which means Turkey’s citizens will no longer be forced NOT to wear the tudung. If you remember, recently, a Turkish lady Member of Parliament was evicted from parliament for insisting that she wear her tudung in the building. University student too must remove their tudung before they enter the university gate.
Turkey is on the other extreme of Afghanistan where the “religious police” would throw acid on faces of women who do not wear the tudung.
Malaysia of 2008 is a far cry from Malaysia of 1958, the first Anniversary of Merdeka. Then, skirts and bare-backs were the order of the day and the tudung was a rare thing at best, the more “decent” Malay women would wear a selendang wit the front hair revealed. Today, women who wear bare-back clothes are arrested.
What happened over those 50 years? Have Malays become more religious and more conscious of their Islamic duties? Over the last month, three women have been charged for corruption and fraud. All are pretty senior Malay government officers. And all wear the tudung. So, the wearing of the tudung can’t be equated with being more religious or being a better Muslim. If not, they would not accept bribes or cheat. Wearing the tudung is merely a symbol. It is a symbol that you are very Islamic. But this does not mean you really are.
Malays, today, talk about restoring the Caliphate and implementing Islamic laws. In short, rejecting a Secular State in favour of a Theology State – meaning an Islamic State of course. But do these some people know what an Islamic State is? And do these people also know how the many experiments of Islamic States have gone horribly wrong and the new “Islamic” government was worse than the old government it replaced?
In a nutshell a Secular State or Theology State is just a name. Names are not crucial. What is would be the function rather than form. Form must follow functions, and not the other way round.
Let us examine some of the failed experiments. Some predominantly Muslim countries have flirted with the idea of changing their government and have discovered that the newly installed Muslim leaders were no better, or worse, that the “kafir” leaders. Millions have died because of this, Muslims killed at the hand of Muslims.
Kurdistan, Afghanistan, Armenia, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Morocco, Sudan, Pakistan, Serbia, Gratis, Syria, Bosnia – just think of any country where either Muslims, Christians or Jews make up the majority population and I will show you a tragedy. No, theology is not the answer. We can’t solve problems by replacing a Secular State with a Theology State. History has shown us that, in fact, more damage is caused. The system is not the solution. It is those behind the system that matter.
A year after the end of the Second World War the Algerians wanted the French Colonialists out of their country. The eight-year war led to the loss of more than a million lives. Both sides wee equally guilty of the barbaric killings where old folks, babies and women were not spared. Finally, in 1962, the French decided to go home. But until today the killings continue; except now it is not Muslims killing Christians but Islamists killing Secularists – and vice versa.
The Turks too wanted the kafir out, so millions of Armenians were massacred. The Kurds were the willing servants to rape and murder the Armenians. This was ethic cleansing of the kind perpetuated by the Germans during World War 2; though maybe only a quarter in number died compared to the Jews.
Later the Kurds were themselves exterminated by the Iraqis and Turks. And the same went for the Afghans where they first killed each other to establish an Islamic State and then the Islamic State killed off as many as the previous “kafir” state did. In Iran, too, more died in the new Islamic State than in the Shah’s “kafir” state.
An Islamic State is no guarantee that you would get a good government. Neither would a Secular State. So it is best that the rhetoric and setting up an Islamic State be discarded and instead we focus on the issue of the setting up of a just state of whatever kind.
We have seen too many deaths over the last 60 years, people killed in the name of Islam. Tens of millions have been killed. Two million in Afghanistan. One million in Iran. One million in Iraq. One million in Turkey. More than one million in Algeria. Many more millions in other Muslim countries. The list goes on.
The Iranians say: those Iranians who died fighting Iraqis are going to heaven as the Iraqis are “kafir”. The Iraqis say: those Iraqis who died fighting Iranians are going to heaven as the Iranians are “kafir”. So, both Iranians and Iraqis are “kafir”. Or is it both Iranians and Iraqis who kill each other are going to heaven since both kill and die in the name of Islam?
With all this killing and the tens of millions of deaths over the last 60 years, all the so-called “Islamic States” are nothing short of failed states whereas “God-less” states like Sweden are heaven on earth.
Maybe you need to choose an Islamic State to go to heaven. But thus far all the Islamic States have proven to be hell. Maybe this is because they talk more about life after death rather than about life itself.
Reference:
http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/14435/84/
Friday, November 7, 2008
The Black Pearl in The White House - is the World New Hope
Congratulation to Mr Barrack Obama for his election as the 44th President of United State of America. Compared to the policies of the Republican Government leading by Mr Bush, W George (jr) which has collapsed interm of foreign policy, extremely severed in economy and the worst in Diplomatic Policies towards developed countries, Latin America, Asian Countries and especially among the worst was the several wanted Muslim Countries (middle-eastern) which had considered as the terrorist regimes like Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Afghanistan, Sudan dan so on so forth.
Mr. Obama has promissing vision for the new hope for the rest of the entire world. Obama has not necessarilly obey to any kind of "Pax of Terrorist Forces" in order to rule the USA and even to comfort USA members in trading and economic cooperations. The real CHANGE must seem to be pacticed and happened for all countries that has diplomatic relationship with the State. Negotiations, Enhancing economic growth, contructing the mutual wealth for the rest of the world must be the highly targeted. People agree with you Mr. Obama to feel much more freedom, harmonious and sharing peaceful conditions will overwhelming this beloved Blue Planet.
Thanks Mr. Barrack Obama, The Coming President of USA
Have a very challanging Tasks to venture Mr President..!
NEW HOPE FOR THE PEACEFUL AND HARMONIOUS LIFE FOR THE FUTURE
Mr. Obama has promissing vision for the new hope for the rest of the entire world. Obama has not necessarilly obey to any kind of "Pax of Terrorist Forces" in order to rule the USA and even to comfort USA members in trading and economic cooperations. The real CHANGE must seem to be pacticed and happened for all countries that has diplomatic relationship with the State. Negotiations, Enhancing economic growth, contructing the mutual wealth for the rest of the world must be the highly targeted. People agree with you Mr. Obama to feel much more freedom, harmonious and sharing peaceful conditions will overwhelming this beloved Blue Planet.
Thanks Mr. Barrack Obama, The Coming President of USA
Have a very challanging Tasks to venture Mr President..!
NEW HOPE FOR THE PEACEFUL AND HARMONIOUS LIFE FOR THE FUTURE
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
New Hope of the rest of the World - in the Hand of Barrack Obama
Kemenangan Obama, moga hubungan AS dan negara Islam diperbaiki
Intan Abdullah | intan@harakah.net.my
Wed | Nov 05, 08 | 3:14:59 pm MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, 5 Nov (Hrkh) - Calon pilihan daripada Parti Demokrat, Barack Obama menewaskan lawannya John McCain daripada Parti Republikan, dalam pilihan raya Presiden Amerika Syarikat (AS) yang berlangsung sejak semalam, demikian menurut laporan awal agensi berita AFP hari ini. Iklan
Pengerusi Pengarah Pusat Reformasi Sistem Pilihan Raya (CERI), Dr Wan Abdul Rahman Wan Abdul Latif semasa mengulas kemenangan Obama berkata, petanda kemenangannya dapat dilihat daripada kemenangan awal yang dicapai di dua buah kampung iaitu New Hampshire yang majoritinya adalah penduduk berkulit putih.
"Melihat kepada pengalaman pilihan raya yang lalu, ketika mana George W. Bush turut memperolehi undi majoriti daripada kedua-dua kampung tersebut yang dikatakan menjadi penanda aras awal kemenangan mana-mana calon presiden AS," katanya ketika dihubungi Harakahdaily.
Pada kebiasaanya, masalah teknikal yang melanda sistem pengundian secara online atau e-voting tidak akan merosakkan sokongan dan kepercayaan calon dan pengundi dalam pilihan raya kali ini.
"Sebelum ini pun ianya berlaku, namun ia tidak menjejaskan keseluruhan pengundian.
"Undi rosak juga merupakan hanya 10 peratus yang disebabkan oleh masalah teknikal dan ia bukannya segalanya," ujarnya mengulas kemungkinan 100 peratus rakyat keluar membuang undi pada pilihan raya yang dianggap bersejarah ini.
Ditanya mengenai sokongan yang diberikan oleh Obama kepada Yahudi dan Israel, beliau menyatakannya adalah sebagai amalan biasa bagi seorang Presiden AS bagi mendapatkan kemenangan.
"Ini disebabkan oleh pihak Yahudi dan Israel mengawal ekonomi dan monopoli aset negara tersebut.
"Ia bukan suatu perkara baru dan ianya perlu dilakukan oleh seseorang yang hendak menjadi Presiden AS," katanya lagi.
Menurutnya, Obama dikatakan mengamalkan sikap yang lebih lembut terhadap negara-negara Islam apabila berjanji akan menarik balik tentera AS daripada Iraq dalam satu manifestonya.
"Beliau telah berjanji akan memanggil tentera AS yang bertugas di Iraq selepas 14 bulan kemenangannya," ujarnya.
Apapun katanya, beliau mengharapkan kemenangan Obama akan memberikan harapan kepada negara Islam dalam memperbaiki hubungan dengan negara tersebut.
"Obama perlu membuktikan sikap anti-perangnya kepada dunia terutamanya dunia Islam," tegasnya.
Obama merupakan presiden AS pertama yang berkulit hitam berjaya memecahkan tradisi budaya perlantikan Presiden negara tersebut yang sebelum ini hanya memberikan laluan kepada calon berkulit putih.
Ianya dilihat sebagai satu perubahan dari segi radikal dan baru apabila rakyat negara tersebut yang berjumlah kira-kira 130 juta orang menerima kehadiran rakyat berkulit hitam atau 'non-white' (coloured). - mks._
Reference:
http://www.harakahdaily.net/bm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17748&Itemid=28
Intan Abdullah | intan@harakah.net.my
Wed | Nov 05, 08 | 3:14:59 pm MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, 5 Nov (Hrkh) - Calon pilihan daripada Parti Demokrat, Barack Obama menewaskan lawannya John McCain daripada Parti Republikan, dalam pilihan raya Presiden Amerika Syarikat (AS) yang berlangsung sejak semalam, demikian menurut laporan awal agensi berita AFP hari ini. Iklan
Pengerusi Pengarah Pusat Reformasi Sistem Pilihan Raya (CERI), Dr Wan Abdul Rahman Wan Abdul Latif semasa mengulas kemenangan Obama berkata, petanda kemenangannya dapat dilihat daripada kemenangan awal yang dicapai di dua buah kampung iaitu New Hampshire yang majoritinya adalah penduduk berkulit putih.
"Melihat kepada pengalaman pilihan raya yang lalu, ketika mana George W. Bush turut memperolehi undi majoriti daripada kedua-dua kampung tersebut yang dikatakan menjadi penanda aras awal kemenangan mana-mana calon presiden AS," katanya ketika dihubungi Harakahdaily.
Pada kebiasaanya, masalah teknikal yang melanda sistem pengundian secara online atau e-voting tidak akan merosakkan sokongan dan kepercayaan calon dan pengundi dalam pilihan raya kali ini.
"Sebelum ini pun ianya berlaku, namun ia tidak menjejaskan keseluruhan pengundian.
"Undi rosak juga merupakan hanya 10 peratus yang disebabkan oleh masalah teknikal dan ia bukannya segalanya," ujarnya mengulas kemungkinan 100 peratus rakyat keluar membuang undi pada pilihan raya yang dianggap bersejarah ini.
Ditanya mengenai sokongan yang diberikan oleh Obama kepada Yahudi dan Israel, beliau menyatakannya adalah sebagai amalan biasa bagi seorang Presiden AS bagi mendapatkan kemenangan.
"Ini disebabkan oleh pihak Yahudi dan Israel mengawal ekonomi dan monopoli aset negara tersebut.
"Ia bukan suatu perkara baru dan ianya perlu dilakukan oleh seseorang yang hendak menjadi Presiden AS," katanya lagi.
Menurutnya, Obama dikatakan mengamalkan sikap yang lebih lembut terhadap negara-negara Islam apabila berjanji akan menarik balik tentera AS daripada Iraq dalam satu manifestonya.
"Beliau telah berjanji akan memanggil tentera AS yang bertugas di Iraq selepas 14 bulan kemenangannya," ujarnya.
Apapun katanya, beliau mengharapkan kemenangan Obama akan memberikan harapan kepada negara Islam dalam memperbaiki hubungan dengan negara tersebut.
"Obama perlu membuktikan sikap anti-perangnya kepada dunia terutamanya dunia Islam," tegasnya.
Obama merupakan presiden AS pertama yang berkulit hitam berjaya memecahkan tradisi budaya perlantikan Presiden negara tersebut yang sebelum ini hanya memberikan laluan kepada calon berkulit putih.
Ianya dilihat sebagai satu perubahan dari segi radikal dan baru apabila rakyat negara tersebut yang berjumlah kira-kira 130 juta orang menerima kehadiran rakyat berkulit hitam atau 'non-white' (coloured). - mks._
Reference:
http://www.harakahdaily.net/bm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17748&Itemid=28
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
